CHINA VC NEWS

April 3, 2010

Fortune Venture Capital Pumps More Cash into Shanghai Meidiclon and Sichuan Xunyou.com

Filed under: Deal — Tags: , — Tim @ 11:16 PM

On Mar. 31, Fortune Venture Capital revealed that it would increase its contribution to Shanghai Meidiclon Inc. (Mediclon) and Sichuan Xunyou.com

Located in Pudong Zhangjiang Biomedical Industry Base, Meidiclon is one of the bio-medical service outsourcing enterprises in Shanghai. The company is mainly engaged in providing medical research and development outsourcing services to clients both at home and abroad. It takes the advantage of the advanced information and technologies from the domestic and overseas medical research and development markets to deliver high-quality service to clients in the field of new drug design, pre-clinical research and development, pharmaceutical intermediates, research on combinatorial compounds as well as biological target protein crystallization.

Xunyou.com is mainly engaged in providing online game acceleration service through its own accelerator software. The accelerator is used to optimize the overall network quality and performance for clients during the data transmission to game server through cutting-edge and innovative technologies such as VPN, dynamic routing, node deployment of full-service providers, transmission path algorithm of online game data, 7×24 hour nationwide network monitor and data relay.

SAIF Injects US$20M to Xiangya Group

Filed under: Deal — Tags: , — Tim @ 11:13 PM

Recently, SAIF Partners (SAIF) announced a total of US$20M capital injection to Xiangya Group, with the first installment of US$11M already transferred. It is the first VC investment received by the fresh-ground medicated diet industry.

Xiangya Group, a leading healthy food producer in China, is dedicated to the research, development, production and sale of all additive-free, natural and healthy food based on traditional Chinese medical theory that drug and food share the same source. Under the flagship of the company there is a famous brand of fresh-ground and health-preserving cereals – “Five Cereals Mill”.

Ben Ng, a partner of SAIF, said that Xiangya Group has attracted the investors in three aspects: First, the healthy food caters to the market demand; second, it is the world’s first store to sell fresh-ground and health-preserving food on the counter; third, it has an innovative and competent management team.

UCWEB Harvests Hundreds of Millions of US Dollar Investment from Nokia Growth Partners

Filed under: Deal — Tags: — Tim @ 11:11 PM

UCWEB, a leading provider of mobile Internet technologies and services, announced on Mar. 30 that it had reached a strategic financing agreement with Nokia Growth Partners, a venture capital firm backed by Nokia. However, both parties refused to disclose the exact amount involved.

This is the fourth-round investment UCWEB has received so far. Previously, UCWEB received angle investment worth of RMB4M from the Board Chairman-Lei Jun and other investors; in 2007, it reaped capital injection of US$10M from Ceyuan Ventures and Morningside Group; Alibaba Group also made a strategic investment in the company in 2009.

This round investment is largely made by a venture capital firm under Nokia; another investor is GGV Capital. However, the parties involved declined to reveal the exact amount of the investment. According to Mr. Yu Yongfu, CEO of UCWEB, this round financing was the most expensive ever in the field of mobile Internet. As a result, the value of UCWEB will surge to several hundreds of millions of dollars.

Yu Yongfu also said that the fund raised this time would be used to recruit product research and development team. UCWEB plans to enroll 500-1,000 software engineers and technicians in an effort to improve its technological innovation capacities.

Online Sales Platform Completes Series A Financing

Filed under: Deal — Tags: — Tim @ 11:11 PM

YesMy Net, an online sales platform headquartered in Shanghai, completed the series A  financing in Mar. 2010. The investor is DCM (Doll Capital Management).

YesMy Net was built as a membership-based direct purchase platform in 2008. The platform provides members with health products with high quality and high price-performance ratio through diverse marketing channels, such as telephone, internal magazine, member email and website.

Now, the brands under the flag of YesMy Net include Yesmywine and YesMytea, which focus on two major consumer goods sectors – originally imported wine and Chinese tea. To date, the two brands have attracted a total of more than 1.5 million members. Yesmywine has grown into an absolute number one B2C operator of imported wine in China, and YesMytea has also become one of the most influential online sales platforms in the tea industry within merely half a year.

Founded in 1996 and headquartered in the Silicon Valley, DCM is one of the largest VC firms in the United States, and runs offices in Beijing and Shanghai. It has made investment in such Chinese companies as Dangdang.com, 51job.com, mbaobao.com, 99bill.com and tuniu.com.

February 19, 2010

Hubei Wewin Secures Investment from VC and Plans for Listing

Filed under: Deal — Tags: , — Tim @ 5:07 PM

On Feb. 1, 2010, Hubei Kehua Insight Venturing Investment Co., Ltd. and Wuhan Good Insight Venturing Investment Co., Ltd. made investment in Hubei Wewin Battery Technology Co., Ltd. (Wewin), indicating that Wewin could hopefully become the first listed company in Xianning City, where Wewin is based.

It was said that Wewin had the signing and cornerstone laying ceremony held at the end of 2007 in Xianning, and was officially put into production in Jul. 2008. As a rising star in new energy industry, Wewin undertook a key special project supported by Hubei Provincial Science & Technology Department in 2008. In the following year, Wewin was rated as a pilot program of innovative enterprises of Hubei province, listed in the promotion scheme of 100 key high-tech products of Hubei province, selected as one of “the companies served by scientific and technological personnel” by the Ministry of Science and Technology, and appraised as a program under the national revival program.

China Fund in Private Equity Push

Filed under: News — Tags: — Tim @ 5:06 PM

China Investment Corp, Beijing’s sovereign wealth fund, has agreed to invest US$1.5bn in the private equity secondary market through custom accounts with three of the biggest specialists in buying second-hand buy-out and venture capital fund interests.

Lexington Partners, Goldman Sachs and Pantheon Ventures have each agreed to manage US$500m for CIC through special accounts, which are to be kept separate from their main funds, according to people familiar with the agreements.

The move is the biggest injection of capital into the secondary market.

It underlines how CIC is using its size to win special terms from private equity groups, including lower fees and transfer of knowledge on specialist markets.

CIC, advised by Step Stone, Credit Suisse and Parish Capital, has spent a year assessing and meeting about 30 secondary managers.

Some of the biggest secondary private equity investors found themselves unable to take CIC’s money because of concerns about conflicts between the custom account it was demanding and their other investors.

“Splitting portfolios creates transfer pricing issues and there will be winners and losers,” said Jeremy Coller, founder of Coller Capital, the biggest secondary investor.

“We are not clever enough to manage the conflicts.”

Yet private equity executives expect more special accounts. Fundraising for private equity groups fell by 60 per cent last year to a five-year low of US$245.6bn, according to Preqin, the research group.

As the flow of money has dried up, the balance of power has shifted to investors.

“The era of big public pension funds and sovereign wealth funds accepting the same terms as smaller investors is over,” David Rubenstein, founder of the Carlyle Group, said.

CIC was created in 2007 to invest US$110bn of foreign exchange reserves in offshore investments.

The secondary market has the advantage of allowing CIC to build quickly a more mature and diversified portfolio.

It has traditionally served as an exit of last resort for private equity investors, who are otherwise locked into funds for at least 10 years.

The market has more than doubled in size in a decade.

The credit crisis caused turmoil in the secondary market. Prices fell to deep discounts to net asset values, dissuading many from selling.

However, discounts have narrowed and more deals are expected this year.

CIC and the three secondary groups declined to comment.

ADB May Start US$100 Million Clean-Energy Venture Capital Fund

Filed under: News — Tags: — Tim @ 5:05 PM

The Asian Development Bank may raise at least US$100 million more in venture capital to invest in developers of advanced clean-energy technologies in the region.

The lender has formed a taskforce to design the fund before seeking management approval, Jun Tian, an adviser at the Manila- based bank’s regional and sustainable development department, said in an interview in Tokyo today.

The lender had already raised US$363 million for four funds focusing on renewable energy including wind and hydropower plants in order to thwart climate change, Tian said. Clean energy investment fell 6.5 percent to US$145 billion worldwide last year from 2008, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, as the global recession sapped funding for the sector.

“ADB’s strategy is to encourage the use of renewable energy and to focus on smaller and poorer countries for using the funds,” said Tian, who worked for China’s National Development and Reform Commission for more than two decades before joining the ADB in 2006. “China already has very strong manufacturing infrastructure and domestic financial resources, but India still is weak at manufacturing, and the country has to heavily rely on imports of equipment for almost everything, such as advanced coal-fired power plants.”

February 3, 2010

Buying Green China

Filed under: News — Tags: — Tim @ 10:37 AM

Venture capital firm VantagePoint Venture Partners has over US$1 billion invested in cleantech initiatives globally and is joining the charge into China. Melissa Guzy is the group’s managing director and group leader in Asia. She spoke to Business Spectator’s Isabelle Oderberg in Hong Kong to explain:

The group is eyeing China’s wind, solar, batteries, utility storage, LEDs and waste management sectors

China’s progress in green technology and climate change initiatives is misunderstood

China is putting its money where its mouth is, making funding available, while the situation in the US can still be difficult

Isabelle Oderberg: How much capital have you invested in China so far in terms of green technology and across China and Hong Kong?

Melissa Guzy: We have invested approximately US$20 million.

IO: And is that number expected to grow over the next few years?

MG: Yes.

IO: Do you want to tell me a little bit about the growth plans and how that’s expected to ramp up and what kinds of investments you’re targeting?

MG: We began the process from a deep sector analysis perspective, so rather than just being opportunistic, as far as saying that we were one of the global leaders in clean tech investing, we decided that regionally investing in cleantech is very different. We prepared sector analysis that we’d been working on, collecting over the last three years, and at this point in time we’ve now completed the sector analysis across a wide variety of areas sectors including wind, solar, batteries, utility storage, LEDs and waste management. Our investment pace will definitely increase over the next few years as we’ve now identified what we consider are very good opportunities in Asia across those sectors.

IO: What have you invested in already?

MG: We’ve invested in the LED space and batteries.

IO: When you say batteries, I assume you’re talking about car batteries. There is a lot of discussion around lithium-ion car batteries and it seems to be quite an interesting opportunity. Is that something that you’re interested in and what are you finding about that development in that space?

MG: Well, really electric vehicles are just at the beginning of their life cycle and so any time you’re at the beginning there’s lots of room for innovation, not only just in the battery, but the battery management systems for EVs and so when we look at it, we look at the complete eco-system; everything from the cell maker all the way to the packaged battery and the battery management systems for EV.

IO: And what about wind farm technology? China is one of the leaders in building wind farms – is that something you are looking at?

MG: We had been looking at wind and I think there’s always going to be improvement in these areas over a long period of time, but the one thing about wind is that I suspect there is possibly able to be less innovation in wind than in other sectors. One area of wind where you will see innovation is the utility storage. How do you store renewable energy, you know, during off-peak hours? And how do you increase efficiency from both solar and wind? By implementing battery technology or other types of technology to store it.

IO: Is this an issue that’s also going on in solar?

MG: Yeah. I think when you look at renewables and you say everybody’s objective is to increase the amount of renewables and their efficiency; one of the areas that we see as a bottleneck today is the storage aspect. And we think you’re going to have different parts of the ecosystem improve at different given points in time, but one great achievement today would be to figure out a low cost storage solution for off peak hours for both wind and solar.

IO: If that question could be answered from the technology development space, would it work across – or could it be applied across – hybrid car technology; solar and wind? Could it be applied across various spaces?

MG: Well, sure. I mean the EV area, too, is going to be about how you charge. We have an investment in Better Place, which just raised a significant amount of money doing infrastructure charging. Battery storage and energy storage is a key area for wind, solar as well as EV.

IO: From a financial point of view, do you think there’s a lot of money in these areas?

MG: Sure. Absolutely . And this is a global issue, so we’re looking for solutions at VantagePoint globally, to solve what we consider one of the key areas in renewable development.

IO: After Copenhagen, China seemed to get a bit of a raw deal in the world media in terms of people saying that China’s the reason that we didn’t get a deal, yet China is actually doing more than most developed countries in terms of improving its record and pumping huge amounts of money into green energy development. To what extent do you think the government’s investment in that kind of technology encourages private equity and venture capital? How important is it?

MG: Oh, it’s very important and they’ve done a tremendous job. People should be applauding how the Chinese government has been fostering the development of the alternative energy sector and when you’re on the ground and you’re working with potential portfolio companies and looking at investments I mean they really have been facilitating the development even in small companies.

IO: Do you think they got a bit of a raw deal in some of the coverage?

MG: Their progress and their support to develop this industry is misunderstood.

IO: Can you tell me a bit about where you think the misunderstanding stems from?

MG: Well, I’ll give you a good example. I think people don’t realise today that eSolar [a Pasadena-based company that has signed a 2000-MW deal in China] was able to get funding for a solar thermal plant in China from a provisional government or actually a local government before BrightSource, which is one of our companies, could get funding out of the US government.

IO: That’s fascinating, isn’t it?

MG: It is. And so what you see is, yes there’s a lot of talk about renewables in the US and developing this industry, but so far when you look at China’s ability to help and support and foster the young companies to develop and grow, they’ve done an excellent job. And if you look at the public solar companies today, how many of them are located in China? Quite a few. Look at wind, you have Dongfang, Sinovel, Goldwind. You have three very good companies in the wind space. If you look at areas of EV, BYD Auto has been extremely aggressive. They’ve done a very good job and in areas where they need development. There’s a lot of local support, provisional support to develop companies to address the needs.

IO: What kind of opportunities are there for investment in the nuclear sector?

MG: We are looking at it, but we just are trying to figure out where we could possibly invest in the nuclear sector. I think there are other people wondering the same thing, but perhaps there’s some innovation in the component level, but we’re still investigating that space.

IO: Are you optimistic that there will be opportunities for development?

MG: We’re not sure, we’re still investigating the area but, in China in particular, there’s clearly support for nuclear and we believe it’s an interesting space.

IO: In terms of the private equity landscape in China and companies coming to this area to invest, do you think there’s going to be a jostle for, I guess, quality investments, or do you think there’s enough to go around?

MG: In the whole renewable energy sector, the alternative energy sector is still in its infancy. I think there are lots of different areas to invest in, so we’re not worried about having it so over-invested. You have to remember, the amount of money that’s flowing into China’s private equity and venture is still relatively small compared with the US. So yes, it’s a popular area, but it’s a country with lots of innovation.

IO: Is it hard to stay on top of it all? There must be so many small companies. I can’t even imagine how many emails you get everyday what with people wanting to approach you. How do you sort them?

MG: Well we are driven by sector analysis, so we really do try to stay focused on a couple of sub-sectors of the space at a time and, if it’s outside of an area where we’ve done significant amount of works, we’ll just postpone looking at it. We really believe that you need to go very deep on the knowledge basis as well as making sure that you look at it, not only from a China or Asia perspective, but globally. One thing that is different about investing in the cleantech sector for private equity or venture is that it requires significant knowledge, compared with other investment sectors; a completely different knowledge set. And so we have a pretty large team in China and in the US relatively for looking at the space.

IO: What’s the size of your staff?

MG: Well, we have seven people in Beijing and four people there are dedicated to cleantech. And we have 17 cleantech people, I believe, in the US.

IO: I was looking at your bio and you’ve actually got an investment banking background. How do you actually evaluate your investment opportunities in this space, from a financial perspective?

MG: Well, there are a couple of key aspects about how you pick winners. One, you’ve got to start with a really good management team. There’s absolutely no doubt that really, really good management teams can figure out how to build successful companies. Strong management teams are absolutely number one. Number two is you have to be investing in a sector or a sub-sector where innovation can be rewarded. You have to have a large enough market, so that if you do develop the really great product, you can actually get rewarded for all the development. And finally you need favourable government policies to support development and innovation in a particular space.

IO: Where do you think the real money is going to be made in clean technology in China right now? Where do you think the real opportunities are?

MG: We look at all phases. We do growth capital as well and we actually do growth capital for some public companies, so we are across the spectrum. One area, today, that we particularly like is lighting. Getting people to change their light bulbs and applying the semiconductor technology to that space is going to be an area that is independent of other aspects, so we like LEDs a lot. We like waste energy. We think it’s very interesting in China. And, as I mentioned, we think that utility scale storage is very important.

IO: When you say ‘waste energy’, just for those of our readers who might not be familiar with the term, do you want to just give a basic explanation for it?

MG: Well, for example, we were looking at a company that takes the slime from coal and turns it into energy. There are other examples of companies taking household waste and turning it into energy. We think that space is interesting.

IO: Are you operating in any areas of water or desalination?

MG: We’ve looked at it, but we’re not focused on it right now. We think it’s a little harder for us.

IO: I was wondering about it, from the perspective of food security, lately and I just thought it would be an interesting area.

MG: Well, food security is interesting. I mean we did fund a company that’s doing culture and logistics because food security is an interesting topic.

IO: Do you think there’ll be a lot of funding given to things like GM food crops and things like that as China seeks to get a grip on the issue?

MG: The food sector is interesting in China. I mean, because you have just mass urbanisation, right, and industrialisation and they’re going to make improvements in different verticals and it’s an interesting area.

IO: Thank you so much for your time.

MG: Thanks Isabelle.

VC Investment outside US Halved in 2009

Filed under: Research — Tags: — Tim @ 10:37 AM

Despite renewed vigour for non-US venture capital investment in the final quarter, 2009 witnessed a drop of 47 per cent from the previous year, with US$8.2bn put to work in 1,391 deals outside the industry’s home ground. This compares to US$15.5bn invested in 1,932 deals in 2008.

In the fourth quarter, venture capitalists invested US$2.5bn in 396 deals in Europe, Canada, Israel, China and India – a 24 per cent drop from the US$3.3bn invested in 472 deals during same period last year, according to new global data from Dow Jones VentureSource.

“The collapse of the global financial markets in 2008 took its toll on venture investment last year, causing annual investment in every market around the world to plummet,” said Jessica Canning, global research director for Dow Jones VentureSource. “The one positive sign going into 2010 is that the fourth quarter was strongest of the year for global investment.”

In the US, venture investors put US$6.3bn to work in 743 deals in the most recent quarter, a slight up tick from the same period in 2008. Throughout 2009, venture capitalists invested US$21.4bn into 2,489 deals for US companies, a 31 per cent drop from 2008.

According to Dow Jones VentureSource, 2009 was the worst year for venture investment into European companies since the firm began tracking the region in 2000. In 2009, venture capitalists invested US$4.4bn (€3.2m) in 916 deals for European companies, down 41 per cent from the US$7.4bn (€5.1bn) put into 1,234 deals in 2008. In the fourth quarter, venture investors put US$1.3bn (€911m) into 252 deals, a 28 per cent drop from the US$1.8bn (€1.2bn) put into 321 deals during the same period last year.

“In Europe, venture capitalists opened their wallets a little wider in the fourth quarter,” said Arno Castanet, research manager in Dow Jones VentureSource’s London office. “But with investors’ capital sources – fundraising and liquidity – still tight, entrepreneurs will continue to face intense competition for capital in 2010.”

The healthcare industry attracted the largest proportion of investment in 2009, collecting US$1.5bn (€1.1bn) in 192 deals, down 29 per cent from the US$2.1bn (€1.4bn) put into 284 deals in 2008. Biopharmaceuticals companies took the biggest slice of the industry’s capital, raising US$1.1bn (€771m) in 103 deals, down 25 per cent from the previous year.

According to the data, the size of venture deals has decreased in all markets around the world since 2008. The median size of a venture capital deal in Europe dropped 24 per cent from US$2.9m (€2m) in 2008 to US$2.2m (€1.6m) in 2009. Mainland China had the highest median deal size of any region with US$7m in 2009, a 13 per cent drop from the US$8m median in 2008.

India saw the most dramatic drop as the country ended 2009 with a US$4m median, down 44 per cent from 2008. Canada’s median dial size fell almost one third to US$4.1m and Israel’s median dropped almost 20 per cent to US$4.5m.

ZQ Game IPO to Raise RMB 750M

Filed under: News — Tags: , — Tim @ 10:36 AM

PowerLeader’s (8236.HK) wholly owned subsidiary Shenzhen ZQ Game Technology (Zhongqingbao Network) plans to raise RMB 750 million by listing 25 million shares on ChiNext board, the company announced January 31.

The company received approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission to issue up to 25 million shares in a public offering on Shenzhen’s ChiNext board under the ticker “300052″, it announced January 25.

January 31, 2010

Chinese IPOs in U.S. Hit Bumps

Filed under: Research — Tags: — Tim @ 7:46 PM

Chinese IPOs aren’t just faltering in China.

Daqo New Energy Corp. postponed its initial public offering of at least 6.5 million American depositary shares that was scheduled to price Thursday night, according to Piper Jaffray. No timeframe was given for a pricing.

Earlier Thursday, China’s only Century 21 real-estate chain sold its U.S. IPO a day late and more than a dollar short. But investors reacted favorably as the IPO market on continued its bumpy start to the year.

IFM Investments Ltd., which says it is the largest network of real-estate brokerage services in China, closed at US$7.30 on the New York Stock Exchange, up 4.3% from its IPO price of US$7.

Daqo, which makes polysilicon for solar-cell companies, postponed its debut after the expected price range was cut Thursday to US$10 to US$11 a share, from it original plans of US$12.50 to US$14.50. Daqo was to trade Friday on the NYSE under the symbol DQ.

With only four IPOs completed this month during a period of uncertainty in the broader stock markets, it isn’t clear whether IFM Investments’ and Daqo’s price cuts and delays bode ill for all IPOs, or just for Chinese companies looking to list in the U.S.

Realtor IFM came public just as the Chinese government is looking to curb lending amid real-estate-bubble fears, while Daqo operates in an industry with oversupply and pricing pressure.

“It’s our perspective that many of the areas which are going to lead the IPO market in 2010 are not being seen in full force yet,” says Paul Bard, director of research at Greenwich, Conn.-based Renaissance Capital LLC. “I don’t necessarily think this current wave of deals is going to set the tone for the IPO market this year.”

IFM Investments, which operates more than 1,000 residential real-estate sales offices in China, sold a total of 12.5 million ADSs, four million fewer than planned-at the low end of an already reduced price range. The company, the exclusive franchiser for the Century 21 brand, on Wednesday cut its price expectations to US$7 to US$8 a share, from US$8.75 to US$10.75 a share.

Although IFM Investments focuses on the fast-growing sales of existing homes in China, and operates in an industry scattered with small brokerage businesses, its deal occurs just as the Chinese government takes steps to curb lending to keep a lid on a potential housing bubble.

Daqo’s IPO hiccups come as its net income is down this year due to a sharp drop in the average selling price of polysilicon.

Axiom Asia Completes Final Closing on Second Fund

Filed under: News — Tags: , , — Tim @ 7:34 PM

Axiom Asia Private Capital Management Services, L.P. (“Axiom Asia”) announced the final closing on its second fund, Axiom Asia Private Capital Fund II, L.P. (the “Fund” or “Axiom II”). The Fund’s total investor commitments of US$950 million represent the maximum amount the Fund could raise under agreement with its investors and exceeded the initial target of US$750 million. The Fund was oversubscribed, with firm indications of interest exceeding US$1.1 billion. San Francisco-based Probitas Partners acted as principal placement agent for the Fund. Axiom II is the successor fund to Axiom Asia Private Capital Fund I, L.P., Axiom Asia’s first fund, which had US$440 million of investor commitments and commenced investing in 2006. The Fund will invest in a portfolio of management buyout, venture capital, growth capital and other private equity funds in Greater China, India, Japan, Southeast Asia, Korea and Australia. The Fund will typically target investments of up to US$100 million per invested fund and will also target select investments in secondary fund interests and portfolio companies alongside invested funds. The Fund is managed by one of Asia’s largest and most experienced private equity fund of funds investment teams led by Yewhong Goh, Chihtsung Lam, and Edmond Ng. Collectively the Axiom Asia team has invested about US$6 billion to private equity globally since 1994 and has experience investing through market cycles. Five of the ten investment professionals at Axiom (Goh, Lam, and Ng as well as Marc Lau and Chris Loh) had previously worked together at GIC Special Investments, the private equity arm of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. Other senior investment professionals at Axiom include Alex Sao-Wei Lee (previously with Coller Capital) and Olivia Tan (previously with McKinsey & Co). The team comprises native Asians with over 70 years of combined private equity experience. “Our fundraising traction is a reflection of investors’ positive view of the Asian private equity market, Axiom’s team and the performance of Axiom’s first fund. Our experience investing over various cycles like the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis helped us to build up a well-diversified portfolio of differentiated funds, which has stood up well despite the global economic crisis,” said Yewhong Goh, a Managing Director at Axiom Asia. “We are grateful to our existing investors, who supported us during a difficult period. 98% of Axiom Asia’s existing investor relationships from Fund I are represented in Axiom II,” added Chihtsung Lam, another Managing Director. “We are also appreciative of the support of our new investors who collectively invested over US$400MM in Axiom II.” “We are delighted by Axiom Asia’s success in raising a second fund, essentially over the period of the global recession,” said Jack Wills, a Principal at Probitas Partners who worked with Axiom Asia on the fundraising. “Axiom Asia is an exceptional organization with compelling investment expertise in Asia, an area of growing investor interest. We congratulate them on their achievement.” Axiom Asia, founded in 2006, is an independent investment firm focusing on fund investments in buyout, venture capital and growth capital opportunities in the Asia Pacific Region. The firm is headquartered in Singapore and manages approximately US$1.4 billion in LP capital.

January 30, 2010

China’s Ahead in the Green-Tech Race

Filed under: Policy — Tags: — Tim @ 7:21 AM

Quick – which nation builds the most wind turbines? If you guessed America, with its blustery Great Plains dotted with whirring GE blades, you’d be wrong. In 2009, China became the planet’s largest producer.

What’s going on here? While America was digging itself out of its financial crisis, China quietly positioned itself to become a leader in what promises to be the largest emerging industry of the 21st century: green tech.

A new report by the Breakthrough Institute, a progressive think tank in Oakland, argues that China, along with Japan and Korea, will dominate the clean-energy race by out-investing America.

Asia’s clean-tech tigers are already launching massive government investment programs to dominate this industry and, according to the report, have surpassed the U.S. in virtually all clean-energy areas, including wind, solar, and electric-car batteries.

America, however, shouldn’t despair. But, says Alan Salzman, CEO of Vantage Point Venture Partners, a Silicon Valley VC firm, “We must ensure that our industrial policy – including laws, regulations, access to capital, and incentives – enables the big industries of the 21st century. It should not,” he continues, “preserve and entrench 19th-century ways of generating electricity, powering transportation, and consuming our natural resources.”

And those changes can’t come too soon.

How to become clean-tech competitive

Prime the pump

Washington should boost investment. Yes, Obama has agreed to spend US$80 billion of the stimulus package on things green, but that pales next to the US$217 billion the Chinese government plans to dole out over the next five years. Some experts are now calling for the feds to pump another US$15 billion a year into basic research for solar, clean coal, and alternative fuels.

Retrain engineers

BYD, an electric-car company in China (Warren Buffett is an investor), has 10,000 engineers working on, among other things, making affordable batteries. With Detroit downsizing, the U.S. has plenty of engineers, but many need to be brought up to speed. One promising sign: A growing number of schools, including Purdue and Colorado State, are offering graduate-level degrees in electric energy systems.

Slash red tape

China just launched its GreenGen project, a US$1 billion super-efficient coal plant that emits less greenhouse gas than traditional ones. America’s Duke Energy (DUK, Fortune 500) signed a pact with the utility building GreenGen to share clean-coal technology. Why? Because of bureaucratic delays it could take eight years to build such a plant in the U.S. – vs. three in China.

360Buy Raises above US$150M in Round 3 Financing

Filed under: Deal — Tags: — Tim @ 7:20 AM

360Buy, a B2C E-commerce company, confirmed on Jan. 27 that it has secured the C1 VC investment of US$75M led by Tiger Global Management LLC, and the investment has so far been in place. The company also revealed that it will receive the C2 round financing before the end of this year, and raise a total funding of above US$150M. This is the largest VC investment in China’s Internet market since the outbreak of the global financial crisis.

Earlier, 360Buy secured US$10M and US$21M through the earlier rounds of financing in Aug. 2007 and Jan. 2009 respectively. To date, 360Buy has raised a total funding of more than US$180M. Liu Qiangdong, Chairman and CEO of 360Buy, disclosed that the company will use half of the US$150M fund to enhance the service in warehousing, distribution, after-sales service and other areas.

When obtaining the US$21M fund in early 2009, 360Buy spent 70% of the money on the development of logistics system and built its own express delivery company with RMB20M. In addition, it has expanded the areas of its warehousing centers in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou to 90,000 square meters.

Sling Giant Goes Public on A-share Market with RMB1.2B Raised

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — Tim @ 7:19 AM

On Jan. 26, Juli Sling formally started trading on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, and was successfully listed on the A-share market. The sling maker is the first private enterprise in Baoding, Hebei Province that has succeeded in making an IPO.
The sling maker has offered 50M shares at RMB24 each, raising a total of RMB1.2B. The proceeds will mainly be used to fund the project with an annual capacity of 66,000 tons of steel wire ropes and 24,000 tons of steel wire rope slings.

It is said that in the most recent three years, the average gross profit margin of steel wire ropes of Juli Sling is calculated to be 29%, while that of steel wire rope slings and chain slings both exceed 50%. The analyst forecasts that the average annual growth rate of operating revenue of Juli Sling will stand at 30% in the next three years.

As the sling manufacturer with the largest size, the richest product lines and the most professional manufacturing capability in China’s sling sector, Juli Sling owns ten product categories, taking up a share of more than 50% in the medium- and hi-end sling market, and possesses a strong pricing ability in the said market.

At the same time, sling products are used in various areas, such as industrial & manufacturing sectors, large-sized lifting equipment sector and engineering construction sector. This makes the company more resistant to the risks of economic fluctuation.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress